Net Nuetrality?

11 Sep

Ok I am not sure which side of the line I should stand on with this subject. Think about it, there is some sort of underlying consequence that is going to hit us when it is all said an done. Should google have to pay the isp companies for the bandwidth they use? No! Should some people who have crappy internet service that is unbarebly slow pay as much as everyone else with that isp?.. No! Why is the isp asking google to  pay for the bandwidth the users of said isp decide to use?. It should not be ok for the isp to block all access to google, or a torrent program or skype. The customers of that isp pay for that internet provider because they say it is unlimited internet with 5mbs service. Then they of course buy out all near by competing providers and become the only provider in many areas.That lil part makes me sick.

Truely if anyone should be paying anyone, the providers should be paying the sites their users visit for giving the users something entertaining because the internet should would be lame without somewhere to go. I sure would hate to just be able to go to looking for technical or medical or love advice.

You just know that that if you select against the whole anti-neutrality  there will be some underlying demon that jumps up from nowhere and makes us regret our decision. Something like all sites will go pay or so bubbly with web 2.0 junk addons that it forces you to have a massive bandwidth service, and everything we are used to as being fast, will then become as annoying and slow as what dial up makes us feel now.There will be so many people on the same service as you just soaking up all the local bandwidth dragging down the resources of local hubs..

I say leave it alone in either direction, isps fix the lines in the areas, people drop that gay assed bubbly looking pastel colored “web 2.0” crap and gadgets/widgets .Skype is useless .. yahoo and msn have been doing everything skype does, for years, and have cost the same the whole time.If the isp hates apple for making itunes, then the isp should offer something cheap for the customers, and make a buck while doing it. and quit whining . We should not have to make a choice in either of those directions, that crap is just a smokke screan for inadequate service and manipulative contracts for a monopolizing organization.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: